lichess.org
Donate

Bobby vs Magnus: Who would win?

@ambrooks said in #19:
> @WRPeter I don't think Fischer was particularly scared of Karpov. It is simpler than that. He knew he was losing his mind, and he knew that a crazy man couldn't keep successfully playing world championship matches.

I agree.
Karpov... who I am a fan of.. IMO wasn't even on Fisher's radar. They never even played. Karpov's autobiography "Karpov on Karpov gives some excellent insight on what was going on in the Soviet Union around the time of the Fisher Spassky match.
Bobby would never ever play under this conditions nowadays. His level of craziness would cost him dearly .
@PaulC123 said in #18:
> Fisher!
>
> How time has made so many forget. (And throw out these modern Hyper inflated FIDE ratings .... they are not real!... and that has been proven.... started with Kasparov and FIDE selling the product of Chess... Now it's Redunkulace!!!
>
> Fisher... for those of you who don't know
>
> He took on the Soviet Union (at that time all the strongest players where from the Soviet union. Fisher claimed ... The year leading up to the candidates matches, they played him as a team... In tournaments, playing various openings to see where he was the weakest, they probed his technique, looking for where they thought his technique was less than stellar. He believed they where directed by the Soviet Government.
>
> 1971 Candidate matches
> Fisher vs Taimanov 6-0 Taimanov get's blasted .. who looses a candidate's match 6-0 and a GM?
> next to get thrashed
> Fisher vs Larsen again 6-0!!! (these are candidates matches!!! )
>
> next to get blown out
> Fisher vs Petrosian The mighty Tigran get blasted 6-2.5 (let us not forget these guys were the top GMs of the day)
>
> Then ... after giving Spassky the first two games in the WC ... one because he didn't show up, the other he played bad... goes on a tear and wins 5 games to Spassky's 1
>
> Does all this with a part-time assistant out of the various hotel rooms he's was staying at during the tournaments.
> Everyone else had a team of seconds working on opening prep... not Fisher...
>
> Magnus never dominated his peers like Fisher did!!!!
>
> Nope .... Magnus Carlsen never did anything like that ... he beat Anand who was past his prime to get the world championship (Anand in his prime was 3rd fiddle behind Kasparov and Kramnik.) Then draws in his first defense of his title with Karjakin , (& wins in none classical time controls) Only time he played like a WC was his last title defense against Nepomniachtchi...
>
> Then he abdicated his championship
>
> IF it wasn't for that fact Fisher then went buck nutty and decided to be a hobo and roam the planet (literally!!!!)
> There wouldn't be a second thought as to who is the greatest.

He didn't "take on the soviet union." That's dumb. Get a grip with reality there Mr. Brainwashed Boomer.
He was playing chess, not fighting wars. He was the greatest of his generation, and he was rated 100 points higher than Spassky, the second highest rated player, which in and of itself is extaordinary. But to claim he was the greatest: that's like trying to claim the 1960's celtics could beat the 1990's lakers. Sports evolve. Players get better because they learn from past mistakes. It's human nature. If we didn't learn, we'd perish. Of course, Carlsen is greater.
The only way that Fischer could beat Carlsen, and it's been mentioned a number of times in this thread and other threads, is if you could somehow transport Fischer to 2024, and give him all the available computer tools, including a year of training to understand modern theory, and a second year of training to go through all of Carlsen's games, understand his habits, his inclinations.

And even that might not be enough.
@Panagrellus said in #13:
> As usual when this type of question comes up, the exact conditions of the thought experiment are not spelled out.
>
> So do you teleport Bobby Fischer in his chess prime age directly to the present [...]
>
> On the other hand, if you teleport 20-year-old Fischer to the present and give him a year or so to catch up with all the computer magic [...]

You forgot the possibility of teleporting (more accurately "chronoporting") Carlsen to the 1970s and erasing from his mind all the computer magic.
My guess is all top10 players would win Fischer. Chess has developed a lot since 70s.
@OctoPinky said in #25:
> You forgot the possibility of teleporting (more accurately "chronoporting") Carlsen to the 1970s and erasing from his mind all the computer magic.

... and many many other possibilities. You could chronoport Fischer directly after birth into the Carlsen household, where he is adopted by Magnus's parents and they grow up as same-age brothers. Who would win in this scenario? Or would one of them quit chess out of frustration?
Both have the fiercest fighting spirit. I'm not sure, but slight edge to MC.
@Sleprithslayer said in #23:
> He didn't "take on the soviet union." That's dumb. Get a grip with reality there Mr. Brainwashed Boomer.
> He was playing chess, not fighting wars. He was the greatest of his generation, and he was rated 100 points higher than Spassky, the second highest rated player, which in and of itself is extaordinary. But to claim he was the greatest: that's like trying to claim the 1960's celtics could beat the 1990's lakers. Sports evolve. Players get better because they learn from past mistakes. It's human nature. If we didn't learn, we'd perish. Of course, Carlsen is greater.
> The only way that Fischer could beat Carlsen, and it's been mentioned a number of times in this thread and other threads, is if you could somehow transport Fischer to 2024, and give him all the available computer tools, including a year of training to understand modern theory, and a second year of training to go through all of Carlsen's games, understand his habits, his inclinations.
>
> And even that might not be enough.

LMAO... as a Boomer, I'll try not to let my age and experience take advantage of your inexperience adolescent mind and nature.

I'll go easy on you little man .. For clarification: I'm comparing career and impact on Chess as a whole ...

Before Fisher, Chess in the West was a geeky nerd game! After it was in every high school and people were getting their varsity letters playing chess. Has Carlsen ever went on the most popular late night talk show in America? At that time .... Fisher did! Fisher was even invited to the Whitehouse by President Nixon.

Seeng the difference yet?

You must think somehow the brain has evolved since the 1970s LMAO! that notion leaves me with a smirk. Or. you take the inflated ELO's seriously ... OMG took me to Shite eating grin!

Did Carlsen dominate any of his peers in any match like Fisher i.e. 6-0?

Ahhh... What was that? Feigning my hand to ear... did I hear a NO? What? I can't hear you?

NO.... he did not.

You need to read up on Fisher and how paranoid he was, and how he worked with little or no assistance (Unlike Carlsen ... being a modern GM who employees a staff for opening prep. )

Fisher himself is on record stating believing that the Soviets on a whole, during several tournaments leading up to the Candidates match, sand bagged or lost games just to see what he would play.

Finally, Your youth shows ignorance (as anyone who would think everything their generation does or is going through is somehow different or better than what came before)

example: People used to say the same about professional Baseball players . They believed pitcher before the 1970s (before they became specialized i.e. closers and relievers etc ) could not hang in the modern game ... Then the Japanese pitchers started coming over, pitching the same game as guys before the 1970s ( i.e. control instead of power... ) And now they are the pitchers most sought after and in high demand. (they can pitch a whole game ... just like the pitcher of yore... )

Or... Boxers.. who thinks Tyson Fury could hand with Muhammad Ali, George Forman, or Joe Fraser? or Hollyfield or Lewis and Tyson?

How about Hockey? i,e, Wayne Gretskey and Bobby Oar.

Sometime someone comes along that is a 1 in a millennium.

If you believe Magnus is the Goat rock on... ... for people that have been around the block, well that's a hard sell... In match play, he's not stood out among his WC peers. & For a 100 yrs classical match play has been that measuring yard stick that we use.