Of course, those are only very tiny part of *all* 8 piece endgames.
@centaur01 That was possible for a while, now, e.g. chessprogramming.wikispaces.com/Freezer
Now just have to find someone who generates all of them and hosts results. :)
@ #58 . If somebody proposed a budget to spend 2 trillion dollars vs 1.8 trillion... I can't really understand the huge figures, but that .2 is a real hum dinger for some reason. I guess the 3 TB will be less meaningful as technology continues to progress... but its still 3 FREAKING TB.
DrHack = guy who used to think 4800 baud was fast.
DrHack = guy who used to think 4800 baud was fast.
#63
Maybe it would be easier to take lczero engine with 7 man tb and train it with 8 pieces?
Much less energy will be wasted, but 100% correctness will be gone.
Maybe it would be easier to take lczero engine with 7 man tb and train it with 8 pieces?
Much less energy will be wasted, but 100% correctness will be gone.
Is there not a flaw in the current implementation of 7-man tablebases here? It keeps suggesting nonsensical sacrifices to bring the number of pieces to 6.
TalkChess.com had discussion between noobpwnftw and syzygy during the 5 month creation of 7-men Syzygy:
"7-men Syzygy attempt"
http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=66797
"7-men Syzygy attempt"
http://www.talkchess.com/forum3/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=66797
I would like to see a 32 piece tablebase.
another site with 7-men base online:
syzygy-tables.info/
syzygy-tables.info/
Great link Mich. I would love to see in Lichess distance to mate like there and in other places :(
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.