It's rated 2300 so you must be at least 2500 to win 90% of games. It's just a rough estimation though.
@Penguinimgm1 said in #7:
> I played him on level 2 you can check the games yourself I just now finished playing both of them.
>
> I did pretty good both games A+ perfect checkmates. That is a deserving reward for even players who often win AND lose.
>
> Both games were extremely good tactical exploits and he played the positions beautifully not falling for a really bad checkmate which can lose players points for instance.
>
> The first game with black I believe went extremely well the only problem is although his beautiful play was stopped due to my stronger play for example when he decided to not try and trade queens in the first game when I was black. When we started tactical manevures it was very risky and I myself didn't know how to handle the position. Excepting of course anything could have happened. I did develope around this losing advantage and tried to win. I went on to capture nearly every first one of all of his pieces!
>
> The same thing is true for the second game. I closed the position early to a losing default advantage. Winning the game eventually of course, but only to my disadvantaged bishiops position in the closed french defense. I went on to gain piece after piece after piece. Until finally my advantage had tried to show itself and the most beautiful checkmate happens to him once again. Dramatic and beautiful but good and very difficult. Of course at the end I had nearly all of his pieces or something.
>
> The computer here can really play well but I managed to capture every single one of his pieces in both games.
>
> These checkmates are very rare and uncommon.
>
> Good luck on your travels. Did you know on a higher difficulty his play should not change all to much?
>
> I hope you learn what you can from the other members here.
You do realize that level 2 is literally trash? we are talking about level 6 wins over here, not 1100 rated bot wins.
> I played him on level 2 you can check the games yourself I just now finished playing both of them.
>
> I did pretty good both games A+ perfect checkmates. That is a deserving reward for even players who often win AND lose.
>
> Both games were extremely good tactical exploits and he played the positions beautifully not falling for a really bad checkmate which can lose players points for instance.
>
> The first game with black I believe went extremely well the only problem is although his beautiful play was stopped due to my stronger play for example when he decided to not try and trade queens in the first game when I was black. When we started tactical manevures it was very risky and I myself didn't know how to handle the position. Excepting of course anything could have happened. I did develope around this losing advantage and tried to win. I went on to capture nearly every first one of all of his pieces!
>
> The same thing is true for the second game. I closed the position early to a losing default advantage. Winning the game eventually of course, but only to my disadvantaged bishiops position in the closed french defense. I went on to gain piece after piece after piece. Until finally my advantage had tried to show itself and the most beautiful checkmate happens to him once again. Dramatic and beautiful but good and very difficult. Of course at the end I had nearly all of his pieces or something.
>
> The computer here can really play well but I managed to capture every single one of his pieces in both games.
>
> These checkmates are very rare and uncommon.
>
> Good luck on your travels. Did you know on a higher difficulty his play should not change all to much?
>
> I hope you learn what you can from the other members here.
You do realize that level 2 is literally trash? we are talking about level 6 wins over here, not 1100 rated bot wins.
We are also talking about real people. And guess what? Your not one of them.
If you could be any more redundant. Do it please.
If you could be any more redundant. Do it please.
Felt pretty easy.
For me, level 5 at 5+0 takes 2 beers to be a more or less even game. level 6 is hard to beat at 5+0 even with zero beers beforehand but at 10+0 it's easier to beat as I have time to blunder check my moves.
It seems that one beer handicup is like playing 1 pawn down.
I've tried playing level 6 and 7. And honestly level 6 is around 2100-2200 lichess blitz, and level 7 is about 2300-2400 level blitz, not even close to 2700! Come on... It plays so predictable, even, very poorly from the opening and then taking over with almost perfect technique... but then one-two silly mistakes. It's a little bit annoying actually. When after an opening you have a clear advantage of +3 or even more and then Stockfish plays like Magnus on drugs and then in a drawn rook-pawn endgame makes a stupid blunder and loses. And also it's very easy to steer lichess Stockfish to your opening preps.
Honestly Stockfish level 7 should be set around 2300-2400, and level 6 around 2200-2300. Didn't try level 8 yet but I'd guess it doesn't make silly blunders and doesn't suck out of the opening :)
@HowAboutAPawnBreak said in #28:
> I've tried playing level 6 and 7. And honestly level 6 is around 2100-2200 lichess blitz, and level 7 is about 2300-2400 level blitz, not even close to 2700! Come on... It plays so predictable, even, very poorly from the opening and then taking over with almost perfect technique... but then one-two silly mistakes. It's a little bit annoying actually. When after an opening you have a clear advantage of +3 or even more and then Stockfish plays like Magnus on drugs and then in a drawn rook-pawn endgame makes a stupid blunder and loses. And also it's very easy to steer lichess Stockfish to your opening preps.
That's a good description of how it plays: superficial opening, 3000 level moves with 1 or 2 blunders and awful endgames usually. It is very very un-human so I dont know if assigning it a human equivalent rating even makes sense.
I also dont think it's very helpful for improving normal play as you usually get to play from a point of advantage and then work to avoid blunders and win a drawn endgame. Against people there is a 'discussion'/ contest of intentions at each stage. [OTOH it's super convenient to beat up on SF5 when my day is otherwise going bad.]
> I've tried playing level 6 and 7. And honestly level 6 is around 2100-2200 lichess blitz, and level 7 is about 2300-2400 level blitz, not even close to 2700! Come on... It plays so predictable, even, very poorly from the opening and then taking over with almost perfect technique... but then one-two silly mistakes. It's a little bit annoying actually. When after an opening you have a clear advantage of +3 or even more and then Stockfish plays like Magnus on drugs and then in a drawn rook-pawn endgame makes a stupid blunder and loses. And also it's very easy to steer lichess Stockfish to your opening preps.
That's a good description of how it plays: superficial opening, 3000 level moves with 1 or 2 blunders and awful endgames usually. It is very very un-human so I dont know if assigning it a human equivalent rating even makes sense.
I also dont think it's very helpful for improving normal play as you usually get to play from a point of advantage and then work to avoid blunders and win a drawn endgame. Against people there is a 'discussion'/ contest of intentions at each stage. [OTOH it's super convenient to beat up on SF5 when my day is otherwise going bad.]
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.