Sorry for the late reply, did not log in to this account for a while, I was out of city.
@risky-chess I did not make them play in order to solve atomic, but to see how they play.
We all know SF does not understand atomic fully, and it plays some quite dubious lines.
In fact, in the game I recorded ( here is the video, it is very long, watch it in x2: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJbhRKl7_sM ), it plays 1. Nf3 f6 2. e3 d6?, which is probably refuted by 3. Nc3 c6 4. Ng5 fxg5 5. Nd5 cxd5 6. Qh5+ g6 7. Qb5+ Nc6 8. Qb6 axb6 9. Bb5+ Kf7 10. Be8+ Ke6 11. f4. And it replies as white with 3. Nd4, about which I do not have much information.
@cat_person Making a neural net playing atomic sounds very cool, please inform me when you start it.
@risky-chess I did not make them play in order to solve atomic, but to see how they play.
We all know SF does not understand atomic fully, and it plays some quite dubious lines.
In fact, in the game I recorded ( here is the video, it is very long, watch it in x2: www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJbhRKl7_sM ), it plays 1. Nf3 f6 2. e3 d6?, which is probably refuted by 3. Nc3 c6 4. Ng5 fxg5 5. Nd5 cxd5 6. Qh5+ g6 7. Qb5+ Nc6 8. Qb6 axb6 9. Bb5+ Kf7 10. Be8+ Ke6 11. f4. And it replies as white with 3. Nd4, about which I do not have much information.
@cat_person Making a neural net playing atomic sounds very cool, please inform me when you start it.