More rapid please
If you want rapid games then you can vote for the time control. You will find 'Vote here' (in blue) at the starting of the team
<Comment deleted by user>
If you were wondering like me, this is the link from the team page that allows to vote for time control: forms.gle/iwdeyZwLTzkVar64A
Voting is a good idea, but just putting on a few regular ten minute tourneys would be much better.
Yes I agree. One needs more time to analyze the different starting position.
More time is required. Look what happened to these chess960 tourneys happening at the same time:
Lichess official hourly chess960 arena 3+0 time control 0 players (2 players paused) lichess.org/tournament/wDlrMUOS
Unofficial chess960 arena 5+20 time control 6 players (1 player paused after playing a game) lichess.org/tournament/X6WqUkQc
7 players is not much. But they preferred to play the unofficial tourney over readily available hourly tourney. I don't think this is one off case. Chess960 players need more time. I wish official chess960 gives more time realizing this.
Lichess official hourly chess960 arena 3+0 time control 0 players (2 players paused) lichess.org/tournament/wDlrMUOS
Unofficial chess960 arena 5+20 time control 6 players (1 player paused after playing a game) lichess.org/tournament/X6WqUkQc
7 players is not much. But they preferred to play the unofficial tourney over readily available hourly tourney. I don't think this is one off case. Chess960 players need more time. I wish official chess960 gives more time realizing this.
I second that, slower time control are much better for improvment, and currently we only see 1+0 or 3+0. I've seen a 3+2 but that still very fast for positional play.
Join the Lichess Chess960
team, to post in this forum